Hi, I'm a writer with 16 years of experience writing for blogs, web and others, here is one of my articles:
"Since this moments the characteristics political of this third world country was announcing an eminent economics at the detriment, most people saw it as a long shot, but in fact could'n even remotely glimpse how quickly would be the decline of this economic boom. In the press gleefully they announced the increase from oil revenues and the government increased public spending announced populist measures called social missions, which looked "as announced" help to the dispossessed, later will be discovered how much philanthropy would be in these measures; On the other hand, strategic alliances with countries with the same economic boom, and in some cases bigger, it spoke of endogenous growth, financial injections in agricultural sectors and many other sectors of equal magnitude, though, this was revealing a mistrust, resentment of a sector of the country and a phrase that we would never be forgotten, that was the campaign slogan "being rich is bad". A president trying to be funny and humorous with each occurrence, who seemed to understand the problems of the majority and resented in a very specific minority, "the oligarchs, the rich", that demonstrated interest and commitment to the economic growth of the country and carried with him a panacea as banner "the socialism of the XXI century ", later we would see that "this cure would be worse than the disease".