Torture is prevented through international law but promoted a security/risk approach to world order. Critically analyse this paradox and speculate on how ''harm'' in the name of deterrence is usedto counter ''harm'' in the name of ''resistence''.
$100-200 USD
Pagado a la entrega
approximately 4,500 words
no plagiarism
OSCOLA style of Bibliography (which means : surname,name, year, title of the book or article, edition, publications and pages used)
Main topics in the main part of the essay about the essay are: what are the paradoxes between the prohibition of torture and its justification, focus on harm as the focus of criquingthe paradoxes(harm as detterence and harm as resistance-paradox), can harm seen in this way be the driver and the challenge for global ordering?. And the introduction and the conclusion need to include the same things in general.
## Deliverables
Reading List:
Findlay M. (2008) Governing through globalised crime: futures for the international criminal justice, Collumpton: willan
Findlay M. and Henham R. ( 2010) Beyond punishment : Achieving international criminal justice, Basingstoke : Palgrave, Macmillaning.
Findlay M. and Henham R. (2006) Transforming international Criminal Justice, Willan
Findlay M. (1999) The Globalisation of crime, CUP
Nº del proyecto: #3295312
